At a glance
Bioconservatism urges caution or limits on technologies that substantially alter human capacities or inherited biological characteristics, especially beyond treatment of disease.
Core principles
- Precaution; human dignity; protection against irreversible harm; concern about enhancement inequality; scrutiny of consent and changes to human identity.
Origins & development
The term developed in debates over genetic engineering, reproductive technology and transhumanism, bringing together both secular and religious objections to radical enhancement.
Economic outlook
It does not prescribe capitalism or socialism. Economic concerns include unequal access, commercial pressure and the possibility that enhancement becomes compulsory in competitive labor markets.
Society & government
Bioconservatives often support regulation of enhancement while allowing ordinary medical treatment. Views differ on reproductive choice, disability, democratic consent and the proper scope of state intervention.
Variations & related traditions
Religious objections, secular dignity arguments and precautionary approaches differ. Bioconservatism is not identical to opposition to all medicine, technology or scientific research.
Debates & criticisms
Critics argue that restrictions can block beneficial innovation or impose disputed ideals of normality. Supporters question whether individual consent adequately addresses collective and intergenerational risks.